When it comes to burning calories, there are two exercises that come to mind – cycling and running. Both are great forms of cardio and can help burn a significant amount of calories in a short amount of time. But which exercise is better for burning calories? Let’s take a closer look.
Cycling
Cycling is a low-impact exercise that is easy on the joints, making it a great option for those with knee or ankle issues. It’s also a great way to get outside and enjoy the fresh air while getting a workout in. When it comes to burning calories, cycling can burn anywhere from 400 to 1000 calories per hour, depending on the intensity of the workout. Cycling also has the added benefit of being a great way to build leg muscles.
Running
Running is a high-impact exercise that can be tough on the joints, but it’s a great way to get your heart rate up and burn a lot of calories quickly. Running can burn anywhere from 600 to 1200 calories per hour, depending on the intensity of the workout. Running also has the added benefit of being a great way to improve cardiovascular health and build endurance.
Which Is Better?
When it comes to burning calories, both cycling and running are effective forms of exercise. The number of calories you burn will depend on a variety of factors, including your weight, the intensity of the workout, and the duration of the exercise. However, running tends to burn more calories per hour than cycling, making it a slightly more effective exercise for weight loss.
That being said, it’s important to choose an exercise that you enjoy and can stick to long-term. If you hate running but love cycling, then cycling is the better option for you. The most important thing is to find an exercise that you enjoy and that you can do consistently.
In conclusion, both cycling and running are great exercises for burning calories. While running may burn slightly more calories per hour, it’s important to choose an exercise that you enjoy and can stick to long-term.
