joined feeds by JS

joined feeds by JS http://www.feedmingle.com/mingle/8034 2009-11-29 Created with FeedMingle.com en-us Why we hate WikiLeaks http://just-dead-gone.livejournal.com/32811.html Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:01:00 UTC There won't be many blogs on the internet with that sort of position. That's why originally I rather wanted to make a video about it, because you can smoothen arguments down a bit which otherwise may appear kind of opinionated. But it doesn't fit in this week (tired of such topics), so I'm not really sure about this dry thing. Many intellectuals prefer to blame where it's easy - overall you seem a good person no matter how you act in other fields of life. WikiLeaks is such a thing, far away conflicts where the reader's not in danger to critizise something where he lives + hurt himself with that. The mainstream ensures websites to follow this trend. So, Julian Assange and the others get their hands on confidential documents someone under unknown circumstances passed on to them. Let it be true they never fell for a fake or hoax - but do they properly check the motives of that party, if the story is huge enough to get their website into the newspaper? They call what they do "modern journalism", it surely sounds competent and close to the people. WikiLeak has become popular - while other parts of the human rights scene stand in its shadow, as of the pure lack of reports about their work. Ironically, among these are people who do background-checks. That's one main motivation why some types in the media like WikiLeaks -> guaranteed publicity and advertising, but doubtable intention to change things. You can easily redirect the impulse of a WikiLeaks-story both way, distance yourself or interprete however you want it - even promote a view on life that authorities are the only ones people can rely on, whereas the internet seems doubtable and dangerous. That destroys a lot elsewhere, of course. Many People long for entertaining stories, but do they really care for human rights like they pretend? Things normally are more complicated than to put confidential material online. -> What if, considering the overall situation of human rights, someone had an interest to discredit e.g. a decent cop, member of parliament, or judge? You can hide behind the mask of this or that deed being so evil one doesn't have to ask further questions, because it's against the law in the first place. But as they say, who gives a shit about the law these days? What if this cop was pressured towards an action - will sites like Wikileaks publish a carefully written story which prevents fast conclusions? How do you know for sure who's behind what accuzation, and if the leak's not a coverup or attempt to destroy someone's reputation, respectively to distract public attention at a decisive moment of time? No doubt, human rights violations have to be made public. But to practice it this way seems a bit greedy. You can get the impression they don't care enough about (referring to the youngest publication) the security of soldiers in war, who fight at least for some sort of stability, regardless the position you take on what's going on down there. Did they analyse each of the 100.000 documents (other than just <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-10806727">anonymize some names</a>), or try to get selected, authentic and symbolic pieces into the newspapers, contact editors like everyone else has to? No. Really risk something when they properly choose whom to make a target, and collect evidence against, or simply let a story worth a lot effort die if it doesn't seem responsible? Neither. Sometimes it seems nobody talks about that anymore, but on the long run the others could get tossed together with the WikiLeaks-style of journalism. "We know these kind of people who put rubbish on the internet!" -> that's what you fear. Julian Assange hides - no residence or contacts in real life, no office - the consequences will always hit competition, but he's in the newspapers. Pakistani soldiers and civilians lost their lifes in this war to fulfill allies' wishes; one can imagine how it feels to then face such discussion of an ISI-'double game' by some rich countries' everyday people. - As a foreigner, you have to respect that. However, WikiLeaks doesn't care about the consequences of their actions (as long as they get them into the media). I mean things like instability, resulting pressure on 'potential'/'future' leakers, which are not protected by the promised limited legal support for submissions. Mobbing against whoever seems critical - apparent too much danger of leaks is bad as it results in overexaggerated discipline damaging elements of integrity in- and outside authorities. It's a very clever way of getting famous unter the pretext of human rights journalism, creating dynamics of their own. It generates more leaks to exploit. Who's not against war? We all know many civilians die when it comes to that, we don't need someone to pretend it's new and he showed us for the first time. Others reported e.g. about the improper use of missiles by private soldiers, in a way these hit civilians by accident. Enabling that sort of criticism in a difficult climate is the dangerous part, to take the political pressure. It seems Wikileaks took advantage of the long-built awareness, established by others, without giving credit. The question if membership in Freemasonic lodges lead to material benefits http://community.livejournal.com/occult_love/4579.html Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:38:33 UTC Just a backup of a comment I wrote under an interesting video, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DwKQmVz1Udw">Introducing Freemasonry-United Grand Lodge of England</a>: <blockquote>Nigel Brown servesîº¾ as Grand Secretary since 2007, so I guess the video is close to this day. Seems remarkable he accentuates against expectations in the direction of material benefit; certainly a big problem Freemasonry has to cope with, today? I'm not a Mason myself (my heart belongs to solitary witchcraft), and not from the UK, but here it is much like that. A lot people might join for career reasons, modifying the message.</blockquote>__________ PS: I pasted this, here, because sometimes little things can mean much; compared all the conspiracy theories on YT. Some of them are fed by the fact there seems to be also misunderstanding within Masonry itself, and actually some lodges to set signals against that. I kind of miss that, some German lodges obviously mix commercial interests with the brotherhood, webdesigners and just overplaying the role for city PR etc. Life in June http://just-dead-gone.livejournal.com/32648.html Sat, 12 Jun 2010 20:19:26 UTC Last week, as written before, I cleaned up some old things. After this post here, around June 18th, this will finish with a restructured hierarchy of the static pages. Moving files from root to a subdirectory leads to a mess of broken links; normally, that's not a big deal - but in Germany, one normal HTML page with a non-working link to your address and phone number means you can be sued by anyone. Political parties intentionally complicated the law to make it difficult for bloggers, and whatever you do online to get your site secure and look acceptable/modern, the neccessary quality checks are a bit much for one person, and the result will seem bureaucratic or dry. Technics is so strangely important, and exhausting. What regards other things, I've found myself hesitating what road to choose. I sceptically spent the weeks reading myself through a mountain of websites, psychology and history literature, mostly from the informal sector, and networking. If you want to help change a climate, there are hardly any options to choose from. Germany is believed a rotten country. The attempt to rebuild the more serious parts of the human rights scene and e.g. try to establish the same tax status as political parties got (in order to make it realistic) meanwhile seems senseless. - Science/activism often has a lazy hanger-on mentality, here, people are used to cheap supermarket prices and got their supposedly traditioned opinions. But if the activist game to address this greed regardless of the consequences (how it's gonna get used, and by whom in the ministry) is not your business, and you're delivering carefully laid-out material instead, you'll run into the problem that noone expects or wishes that, though they all pretend to. People always seek for reasons it may be 'clever' to not involve. So they can take the usual shortcuts to suppose nothing mattered so it's ok to support far-left radical groups and signal, which pretty much means accurancy of reporting doesn't matter anymore and they can do what they want. While our goal is to prevent any further lifes getting hurt by ideological mobbing and denounciation. I'm already involved so many things, my correspondence alone could fill books. I encourage people, comfort, try some university networking, etc.. An example: The Iranians in German exile have a huge influence in the scene here; many people see them as kind of a signal for freedom, as they are "also fighting against a shadow-government". Now, you're perhaps the only one who tries to make aware it's probably not a good idea to generally accuse German companies doing business with Iran. Economy tends to open up regimes, and blaming them on this public scale makes us all look socialist + distanced from economical reasonability. This directly leads to the big problem in Zombie-times, the leftists' accuses make it possible to say -> whoever critizises something were a troublemaker, as it seems known to be "just the usual" socialist hook, public awareness and the world will be a better place ;). To be true, I never liked these exile-people, because it's so fucking easy to campaign here, while they don't have any clue what to do about the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basij">Basij</a> in their country, sometimes even act as if Germany was a human rights dream, and the only problem on earth were the Mullahs. However, even though blogs like mine proof that the assumption "nothing out there except leftist bs" is false, still it's declared not good enough for the people who claim to be caring intellectuals. I mean ones who studied literature, history or politics mainly at some philosophical faculty. This game to deny the existence of us moderates and so create an artificial view of life doesn't seem to ever end, and so for us the question is where self-exploitation potentially turns out real destructive. Whereas the stats of my blogs are somewhat of a dream, it's all worth nothing if noone in these spheres trusts the chances to bind you in up to a certain level so you can serve as a valve or insurance if other options fail. Today they hopelessly rely on people on the left or right, with side-effects of funding they just can't control, like pauperization of subcultures, violence on the streets, general ignorance, etc.. All people like me can do is to keep offering, and not make mistakes. I hope that somewhen the message earth warming forces a change in politics; but Germany can be real slow and convenient. In the notebook, recently, you read about <a href="http://www.google.com/notebook/public/12592207904047624156/BDdRW3goQ2-7y7YUl#NDUUJ3goQ47vVg4sl">some estimations</a> regarding the plan to go to constitutional court to get tax exemption for bloggers. I delayed everything in this direction, and I want to name my reasons. I didn't get sufficient feedback from the letters I wrote, so doesn't fulfill my conditions to what I said was possile. Additionally, overall *physical=body* health (eczema, circulatory problems, teeth and these little things which all belong to an eating disorder) is not perfect, though not real bad, either. - In business, they rely when they know a person has sufficient happiness in life + standing; me, I'm doing fine, but I never had a vacation, and that's a high-risk factor, in terms of people spreading opposite rumours. The ones who said they were interested in my idea so far didn't signal they'd recommend me just assume someone will ;), and that at least for now turned the balance against it. Others warned me meaning good, and this encourages the line that I just don't see how I'm supposed to have a life in case I engage, there. Besides, meanwhile, the world soccer championship began, and believe me, in that sort of lazy "national" hype climate there's nothing you can win. Seriously, one could rather write a book about little things that make life more safe for people/families, you know, some experiences or ideological/religious foundation others have a chance to identify themselves with and benefit practically. Such at least gives you a chance on something like a bit private life - it's easier to arrange than a job where you feel exploited and abused, as you never even liked the naive human rights scene, just brought in the dilemma of a moral conflict which made people locate you there. You can't fight and run all your life (little hint on <a href="http://www.amazon.de/gp/search?ie=UTF8&keywords=Drugstore%20Cowboy&tag=untitled02-21&index=dvd&linkCode=ur2&camp=1638&creative=6742">Drugstore Cowboy</a>). That could be a bridge when e.g. soccer-politics dominates the public where it's uncertain anyways, if one should be present, then. best wishes <3, J. Augsburg problems http://just-dead-gone.livejournal.com/32404.html Sat, 12 Jun 2010 19:16:18 UTC This month so far wasn't lucky. I don't take it well when people invite me to go out with them, as if it's just like chilling out + having fun. For them maybe, but I'm not so free in the choices - everyone here knows me and when you stand for something, you got to carefully choose where to be seen. Because a visit in a bar means you identify yourself in some way with that place. To be true, I hardly know anything about the Augsburg club scene. When I was a student, I got bullied from very early on by leftist groups, and after my name been dragged through the dirt all over the scene, never had a chance to connect - and people are very well aware of that! - However, networking is a weak point here, anyways: people claim it but don't ever try? After such what happened to me, being kind of "blacklisted" all over, I can expect that before suggesting some place I never heared of, they please incidentally check first with friends e.g., or someone like door keeper, if this is a friendly place. "Hey you know this type, what do you mean, should we...?", and signal that in some way. Otherwise I'd make myself ridiculous if it turns out that the club is owned by a guy who's hanging out with people who bullied me. But here, noone talks to each other except for who might be gay, nuts or a bitch/cunt lol. Seriously, often that's 75% of the conversation of students around here. Nobody talks to you, but all about you, behind your back. But then it's your fault, and they pretend you have to do all the work. - Some nice timework company's manager said to me "You know, with your popularity, normally one has no problems whatsoever due to connections, but..." - Yeah -> except you live in Augsburg? Last Friday however, there was a nice invitation where this doesn't apply for I could have asked "I guess this place is ok, or you wouldn't have mailed?" - But he wrote at a bad point of time, I felt exhausted after workedthrough few days and nights just then. Again, kind of strange, I excused myself, and to be honest was relieved I had a good+honest reason for this. But I'm not real happy with it, either, perhaps I should've mentioned the problem? Otherwise, people know this, and my position meanwhile tends towards sufficient arrogancy - as long as noone here makes the first approach, I know that many people like me, but I can't open up. I mean, I'm 35 years old, and in any other city would have had the chance to change something since quite some years, you know, not be the underdog-type forever. I want a life, and just can't attend some party as if I start fresh like students who move here. Again, this is self-explaining, and the way I see it you should be very protective of your options in life - to never sell yourself under price, esp. in egoistic German society. As I got little $ anyways (this month enough to get along), I just don't care anymore about what people expect. Access to what's valuable in life http://community.livejournal.com/hate_backfires/23466.html Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:38:12 UTC An article I found on Mashable, today: <a href="http://feeds.mashable.com/~r/Mashable/~3/-4tYkVqTpmU/">http://feeds.mashable.com/~r/Mashable/~3/-4tYkVqTpmU/</a> So one of course has to be careful with statistics because people potentially overexaggerate such things a bit out of opportunism; however - looking back to my own not so far time in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gymnasium_(Germany)">Gymnasium</a> (1985-94), I'd have spent a lot time with office applications if only been enabled/allowed to that. When I was 10-17, I put my frustration in video game drafts on paper (which I destroyed lateron, as parents s.t. searched my room for 'nonsense' other than theoretical stuff). Pretty much map studies, most 2D. My family had no money + there were no computer courses at school (though they had a room for that). I got my first PC as a then outdated early Pentium in 1999. Yeah, such news make me feel good (except the teacher's view on discipline/bs), because that's how one can see so many, today -> great potential not given enough chance. Ich bin ein Psychologe! / I'm a psychologist! ;) *LOL* http://just-dead-gone.livejournal.com/31727.html Fri, 23 Apr 2010 12:12:10 UTC Recent weeks I worked on old files, and found this - a letter addressed to me by a <a href="http://www.psychiatrie-und-ethik.de">psychiatry ethics group</a> which I'd asked to send me material. They seem to primarily get in contact with psychologists - but yeah was funny to find me (with my complicated background what regards the field) addressed as one with diploma. :D Ich hab vor Kurzem meine Akten sortiert, und bin dabei auf das hier gestoÂ�en - zeigt (etwas per Bildbearbeitung gequetscht fÂ»r kleine Bildschirme) einen Briefumschlag, mit dem die <a href="http://www.psychiatrie-und-ethik.de">Walter-von-Baeyer-Gesellschaft</a> mir letztes Jahr Rundbriefe zusandte. Das war ein Â»bler Angriff auf meine Lachmuskeln! :D <img src="http://www.alice-dsl.net/js7/preview/psychologist-cover.jpg" /> *Terminologie* (about some roots of modern racism in Germany today) http://just-dead-gone.livejournal.com/31053.html Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:00:29 UTC English: Did you ever have this feeling, that leftists, when calling persons "Nazi", just have fun - and with saying so help the other side justify  to pretend national socialism to be tradition and themselves patriots respecting it? It seems a dynamic of its own: The more these urban types demonstrate, the more it justifies that liberals get consciously mistaken for leftist trouble makers + beaten up, while the real socialists can do whatever they want and amuse themselves during provocation, while indeed it goes hand in hand with bureacratic folks. In the US there's a different state culture, here around in Germany in many regions a frugal need of scapegoats, because having to deal with violence justifies to take easier/"drastic" approaches and judge by if you like how e.g. the other side looks or if someone is gay = a potential "blood-sucker" of state money. Confrontation helps hypocrites to belie themselves. You can render this symptom successfully even on the intellectual scene, the pretenders to fight for good while all they do is suggest others were in confrontation with state authorities. Therefor, they say, it's better to keep out and watch from a distance - yeah, they are forced to do so as these humanists seem so "radical" - which is exactly what they want, and spreads conspiracy theories far right officialism needs in the first place. I can't do this very good in English, but that's one of the main thesis in my blogs, and perhaps it's understandable. Nothing is like it seems. A lot people here in Germany pretend to be good Nazis (waving regional or national flags, pretending to never critizise s.th. = be "economists" etc.), which always creates enemies to make oneself stand out. Avoiding old terms like "jew" makes these Germans innovative, but it's the old pattern, where you can take everything away from a person if overplaying ideology up to a degree where every other behavior can be declared "radical", and the person then disowned. Often I'm wondering why in 60+ years of post-Nazi German science, literates still don't devide between real national elite and what they call "Nazis". The way I see it, this is a conveniance factor, or a mental illness; these types of broken men who take hanger-on mentality with maturity. And the pattern is responsible for a lot of hidden violence and racism in our society. - The poem-styled German text below is extremely provocative, kind of snapped through to the other side. -- Abriß. Unterschied zwischen unserer Generation und diesen komischen Typen im Bürgerrechtsbereich - mit all ihren Nazi-Vorwürfen -> was ja nur dafür sorgte, daß die größten Schweine in der Politik die Sympathie der angegriffenen Eliten aus dem Reich (bzw. ihrer Nachkommen) beanspruchen können, sodaß wir im Niemandsland der angeblich Vaterlandslosen krepieren... <ul><li>nationaler Sozialismus = heutige Möchtegern-Nazis, damit's noch bequemer geht</li><li>die Nationalsozialisten waren doch eine Elite, und das sind sie selbst eben auch weil sie wollen doch $. oder reiche Manager, ja das Leben ist ungerecht und wenn man nix fordert kommt man auch zu nichts. und heißt es nicht, man solle sein Licht nicht unter den Scheffel stellen? ja, man ist doch lokalpatriotisch, und die anderen sind zu blöd dazu</li><li>sehn Schindler's Liste, wenn's ziert, und sind am nächsten Tag Juristen, die heldenhaft durch Zersetzen unverschämte Entschädigungs-Forderungen böser Juden und Griechen abwehren</li><li>"ist das vielleicht ein Jude?!" - natürlich, das macht es noch einfacher, dann muß man nichts mehr prüfen, also wird das wohl so sein. bösartig schauen die aus irgendwie, sodaß man auf stur schalten muß, zur Sicherheit...</li><li>oder offen gesagt -> stinkfaule Kommunisten eingenistet beim Staat, die im Zweifelsfall alles Mögliche sind</li><li>daß sie uns nicht "Juden" nennen, macht sie zu innovativen Kommunikationsministern des Multimedia-Zeitalters :)))</li><li>Lehrer, die nicht wußten, was sie werden sollten -> und dann vor der Klasse stehend, in Sorge, sich als jener Depp verlacht zu finden der sie sind, endlos Ekeleien schmettern, aus der Angst vor einem Moment entlarvender Stille...</li><li>Spaltpilze & Co., die verrückte Wirtschaft, bekloppte Spinner, so unsinnig daß darüber zu reden sich doch erübrige...</li></ul> (entstanden zu Goldfrapp "Eat yourself" aus dem Album <a href="http://www.amazon.de/gp/search?ie=UTF8&keywords=Seventh%20Tree%20Goldfrapp&tag=untitled02-21&index=blended&linkCode=ur2&camp=1638&creative=6742">"Seventh tree"</a>) Kurzfassung vieler Probleme in der deutschen Justiz / Typical problems in the German justice system http://just-dead-gone.livejournal.com/30916.html Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:45:05 UTC Today's problems in the German justice system. It's an outtake from an open letter (sometimes seems better to not critizise from an analytic point of view), which aimed at compressing reality on few lines of text (please excuse my bad English): <ul><li>the pressure of some media which recently declared judges potentially "leftist", or to just give the judgement a new meaning</li><li>to mock the possibility someone could be innocent</li><li>practise of certain judges to use prejudices as if they were proof (which is quite common in Germany), in order to shorten the court session and gain impact for an already made political verdict</li><li>the fear of lawyers to loose trust or get bullied by the court system if they seriously defend their clients, which often leads to pressure and the lawyer/client to not fully make use of the possibilities, in a climate where this means to loose in court</li><li>influence of far-right-extreme city council members and "VIPs" on courts</li><li>dubious psychiatric evaluations against critics</li><li>house searches to discredit them</li><li>and cases of police brutality</li><li>as well as bullying low-income citizens who want counselling by law professionals, intentiously making things more complicated, then suggesting that it's right to be bureaucratic because you got to protect the court from "annoying citizens" who waste state money by lawyers (self-fulfilling prophecy)</li><li>or in other words: a too lazy use of law, which if you'd name it the way I did here would seem aggressive, and have no chance against nice speeches. 8)</li></ul> -- Das Ergebnis von 1 1/2 Tagen, wo ich an einem Offenen Brief gearbeitet hab. Meine Frage dabei war: Kann man den Wahnsinn deutscher Realität noch auf wenige Zeilen komprimieren - oder ist es besser, die Dinge als bekannt vorauszusetzen, und einfach nur darauf zu verweisen? Ursprünglich war mein Brief 1 1/2 Seiten in großer Schrift Georgia 12 Point - nicht schlecht. Aber ich fand, daß es der falsche Weg ist, noch direkt zu benennen, und hab das Meiste gelöscht. Hier das Überbleibsel des Experiments vieler hundert verworfener Zwischenfassungen - wenige Zeilen, die bündeln, und vielleicht anderen als Referenzstelle dienen können: <ul><li>Sticheleien bestimmter Medien gegen Richter, deren Urteile polemisch in die linke Ecke gestellt werden</li><li>eine umdrehende Auslegung ihrer Entscheidungen</li><li>Law&Order-Berichterstattung, die nahelegt, daß "da doch immer was dran ist, wenn die Polizei kommen muß", und so das Prinzip der Unschuldsvermutung lächerlich macht</li><li>vor Gericht "irgendwie wohl naheliegende" (aber unsachliche) Vorurteile übertragen, und Verfahren unzulässig verkürzt werden</li><li>die Befürchtung vieler Rechtsanwälte, sich im Falle ihres Eintretens für vorverurteilte Mandanten zu beschädigen/den Ruf zu verlieren, sodaß sie sich ihre Möglichkeiten nicht auszuschöpfen trauen</li><li>Einfluß rechtsextremer Stadträte und "VIPs" auf die Justiz</li><li>zweifelhafte psychiatrische Gutachten gegen Kritiker</li><li>willkürliche Hausdurchsuchungen, um Existenzen zu beschädigen</li><li>und Fälle von Polizeibrutalität</li><li>oder anders ausgedrückt: Bequemlichkeit im Umgang mit dem Recht, die benannt so richtig geil gestört/hyperventilierend wirken muß, und kaum eine Chance hat gegenüber den Reports über toughe Staatsanwälte & aufgeflogenen Junkie-Ärschen, sowie braven Reden über gewachsene Rechtsstaatlichkeit in deutschen Landen... 8)</li></ul> A German text about cults (regarding false definitions, and rules when considering to join one) http://community.livejournal.com/occult_love/4148.html Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:41:50 UTC Textentwurf / Regeln fÂ»r einen verantwortungsvollen Umgang mit dem Begriff "Kult". Das hab ich geschrieben fÂ»r Toleranz/psychiatriekritische Kulte. Wurde recht allgemein/nicht auf eine bestimmte Gruppe bezogen, auch wenn es evtl. so ausgelegt werden wird. FrÂ»her Entwurf, aber ich bin zufrieden. <ol><li>Am wichtigsten: Die meisten Kulte sind Widerstandsgruppen. Bequeme Zombies erwarten, sie mÂµgen ihre Probleme lÂµsen, und darÂ»ber hinaus den gleichen Lebensstandard bieten wie das satanische Alltagsleben, welches Â»berschattet. Hier tun sie den Sekten unrecht. Kulte sind was fÂ»r Leute, die sehr leiden, und in harter Arbeit gegen was ihr Leben zerstÂµrte -> ErfÂ»llung finden. Entsprechen sie dieser Definition, ist der Begriff positiv gemeint und steht uns hÂµher als (oder gleichwertig zu) "Kirche". </li><li>Es gibt dort die letzten Orte der Menschlichkeit - und groÂ�en Betrug der Poser. Vor allem anderen zÂ£hlt, wirklich nur das einzugehen, was man will und worÂ»ber man sich bestmÂµglich alternativ informiert hat. </li><li>Niemals zu glauben, nur weil jemand sagt, Du solltest glauben - Dich aber auch nicht von denen in die Irre leiten lassen, die mit dem Argument, Dir das zu sagen, Â»berzeugen wollen. Es gehÂµrt zum heutigen Zierrat.</li><li>Sich nicht auf fremdes Terrain begeben, das einen von sich selbst entfernt. Man kann nur das eingehen, was man bereits von tiefstem Inneren heraus war. - Und auch hier: Sich nicht Â»berrumpeln zu lassen davon, daÂ� Leute die Eigendynamik des VorfÂ»hreffekts ausnÂ»tzen, man habe etwas lÂ£ngst gewollt, nur wisse es noch nicht.</li><li>Beides zusammen: Wir leben in einer Kultur, wo institutionelle Kommunisten (Lehrer, politische Psychiatrie, Parteien und zugehÂµrige Verwaltung, manche Kirchenkreise) vermitteln, man habe unendlich viele MÂµglichkeiten im Leben, sodaÂ� alles nur ein Spiel sei. Glaube/Religion eingehen heiÂ�t bereits mit verharmlosten Kirchen eine tiefe Bindung einzugehen, woran sich alles bricht, was Du erbringst, Dein ganzer Wert - oft sind diese Dinge eine Form des Satanismus, und die Widerhaken hindern Dich am Leben. Es gilt der Grundsatz, daÂ� Du zum Zeitpunkt, wo Du Dich informierst, nicht im StreÂ� oder unter zu groÂ�em Druck bist, und der anderen Seite gewachsen = Zeit hattest, Dich selbst zu beschÂ£ftigen mit den Dingen, und abzugleichen damit, was Du wirklich willst. Etwa die traumatischen Reden spinnerter Lehrer und Studenten, das Brainwashing des Schulsystems abzustoÂ�en (ich meine das fÂ»r Erwachsene, Teens binden sich besser nicht, in Solitary Witchcraft bleibst Du selbstbestimmt). Vor jeder Bindung solltest Du fragen, ob es wirklich das ist, was Du vom Leben willst, und der Preis im VerhÂ£ltnis steht. Ob eine Bindung anderer Arbeit respektiert (Kirchen z.B. nicht andere Gruppen ausgrenzen), die Mittel zum Erreichen deren Zielsetzungen verhÂ£ltnismÂ£Â�ig sind und nicht letztlich die gleichen Wege wÂ£hlen wie jene, die sie kritisieren. Oft hat man den Eindruck, daÂ� manche vorgeben, sie heilten Wunden, aber schneiden dafÂ»r andere, und machen sie zu SÂ»ndenbÂµcken.</li><li>Fernhalten sollte man sich von allen Gruppierungen, die einen belasten. Den Paganen muÂ� man zugute bringen, daÂ� sie die einzigen StrÂµmungen sind, welche der/dem Einzelnen die MÂµglichkeit zusprechen, Magie zu praktizieren (mit der EinschrÂ£nkung, daÂ� man weder sich noch anderen wehtÂ£te). - EinschrÂ£nkung oder Verwaltung von Magie durch Hierarchien ist ein Zeichen dafÂ»r, daÂ� Dinge mit hineinspielen, die aus glaubensfremden Bereichen stammen.</li><li>Genauso wie bei negativer Psychiatrie/Psychologie, gilt, daÂ� man sich von niemandem belasten lassen sollte, ohne daÂ� sie/er vorher geprÂ»ft hat, ob man es nÂµtig habe.</li><li>GrundsÂ£tzliche Skepsis ist aber auch angebracht, wenn bestimmte staatliche Stellen versuchen, Kulte und freie Glaubensgemeinschaften zu dÂ£monisieren. Zuweilen hat man den Eindruck, daÂ� Gruppierungen zumindest in Teilen gepusht werden durch Konfrontation, und so eine Art Symbiose eingehen, oder fremdgesteuert sind. Das kann "gut" gemeint sein als Ventil fÂ»r negative Energie im Volk - doch leider ist diese Argumentation Â»berstrapaziert und beliebig, Ausdruck der Bequemlichkeit.</li><li>Nicht jeder Psychiater oder Psychologe sieht die psychiatriekritische Bewegung als negativ, weil es unter den extremen Bedingungen unserer Zeit gut sein kann, daÂ� externer Druck aufgebaut wird, um *von Insidern nicht aussprechbare* Kritik benannt zu finden. Grundregel ist hier, daÂ� jeder Beteiligte den Eindruck machen muÂ�, sich nicht wohl zu fÂ»hlen dabei, denn die komprimierten harten Botschaften sind sehr deprimierend -> Â»berzeugte Jungmanager welcher Seite auch immer mit ihren an der RealitÂ£t Deines Lebens vorbeigehenden ideologischen Phrasen, oder Â£ltere die ins gleiche Horn blasen und sich dem Vokabular/Design der Zeit gestelzt wirkend anpassen, sind ein Grund zur Sorge und Vorsicht - auch im Berufsleben.</li><li>Vorstellungs-/Argumentationsebene muÂ� die gleiche sein, und beide Seiten sollten Â»ber ausreichend Erfahrungen verfÂ»gen. Auch ein gutes Argument, Dinge nicht zu nah an sich heran zu lassen, zumal einige Gruppen mit Psychoterror arbeiten (Wiederholungen etc., oder die MÂµglichkeit nahelegen, der Einzelne kÂµnne spÂ£ter von sich aus zukommen). Glaube ist abhÂ£ngig davon, daÂ� Dir Design und Stil gefallen, es leicht machen Dich einzufinden und LebensgewiÂ�heit zu entwickeln. Macht ist angewiesen auf Gestaltung, d.h. ist das ein ungleiches VerhÂ£ltnis, verkÂ»mmert der Part, welcher sich anpassen muÂ�, weil er sich generell emotional und spirituell Â»berfordert.</li><li>interessant: "Wenn ein Glaube AnhÂ£nger mehrt, geht das in der Regel zu Lasten der ReligiÂµsitÂ£t allgemein, weil Anerkennung durch bestimmte Institutionen erfordern, zu verweltlichen bzw. unterschwellig gegen alle anderen Glaubensrichtungen zu kÂ£mpfen. Es ist meist nie ein Gewinn aus der Gruppe selbst heraus."</li><li>Kulte, die befreien, haben oft das Problem, daÂ� Menschen aus einem unglÂ»cklichen Leben herausgelÂµst bzw. kÂ£mpfen wollen, das aber nicht realisieren - den Preis nicht, d.h. sie wollen und wollen dann nicht. Wie das vereinen? GrundsÂ£tzlich gilt, daÂ� die Frage, was der Mensch will, stets voranzustellen ist, sowie jene danach, ob er in der Lage ist, einzuschÂ£tzen - und die auf ihn verwendete MÂ»he es wert, bzw. Ermutigung/Druck nÂµtig sind, um ihn zum fÂ»r sie/ihn Guten zu bewegen. Wer ehrlich ist, weiÂ�, daÂ� viele Menschen in Verhaltensmustern gefangen sind - sie Minderheiten denen sie sich anvertrauen im Zweifelsfall denunzieren, ob nun bewuÂ�t oder nicht. Das macht weite Teile des UnverstÂ£ndnisses gegenÂ»ber Kulten und Freimaurerei aus.</li><li>Was ein Kult oder eine Sekte ist, und daÂ� Religionen dem ebenfalls entsprechen... FÂ»r Dich ist das Christentum ein Kult nicht weniger als andere, wir paganen Glaubensgemeinschaften sind Konkurrenz fÂ»r sie. Das bestimmt unser VerhÂ£ltnis zu ihnen - mit Konkurrenten redet man mitunter sofern sie sich korrekt verhalten, allein um den Markt sauber zu halten, und wenn einer unfair angegriffen wird, kann es klar begrenzte Zusammenarbeit geben - trotzdem Â»berwiegt der Argwohn, speziell weil bei Kulten/Religionen nicht selten gestohlen wird. FrÂ»here Entnahmen ~ grÂµÂ�ter Vorbehalt.</li></ol> (in einer langen Nacht von 23.-24. MÂ£rz 2010, sowie Punkte 1+2 +leichte Â�berarbeitung am 13. April) Wie sieht das eigentlich aus, wenn Callcenter-Agenten bei der Polizei 'petzen'? http://community.livejournal.com/terrorcalls/7844.html Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:48:59 UTC Das weiter unten ist so ein Teil. NatÂ»rlich gab's fÂ»r den Telefontypen nie eine Antwort; von Polizisten wird heute erwartet, Betrug zu vereinzeln auf den BÂ»rger, als ob das immer so wÂ£r'. Der Lokalteil legt nahe, "diese komischen Unternehmen" seien irgendwie halt wohl nur modern, und sie sponsern doch den FuÂ�ballverein! :D In etwa so sehen jedenfalls Callcenter-Leute Polizei -> als mitunter allzu bequem/"naiv" - das heiÂ�t nicht, daÂ� dieses Bild stimmen muÂ�. Aber es prÂ£gt die 'RisikoabwÂ£gung' der Teammanager. Manche Polizisten sagen, wer sich ins Haifischbecken begebe, mÂ»sse sich doch nicht wundern - als wÂ£ren das rechtsfreie RÂ£ume gemÂ£Â� einem Konsenz der Gesellschaft. Der vielerorts aber in der Tat ungeschriebene Rechtsgrundlage ist vor Gericht. Freilich haben Leute mit sicherem Sold gut reden, weil sie eben beim Staat selten Gefahr laufen, in einen Gewissenskonflikt zu kommen. Aber es sind Deiner Erfahrung nach diese "realistischeren Bullen", die sich woanders wirklich engagieren; denn zumindest betrachten sie die Branche als dubios. Wie dem auch sei, hier das kleine <a href="http://www.alice-dsl.net/js7/preview/telefonaktion_hess.png">Zeitdokument</a>. So in etwa sehen die Mails immer aus: voller Sorge, weil jeder weiÂ�, daÂ� Du in Deiner Stadt der Arsch bist wenn sich das rumspricht. Denn es ist doch wohl echt gestÂµrt, zu den Bullen zu rennen, und sich dadurch die Karriere kaputtzumachen?! (Nette GrÂ»Â�e an die Polizeidirektion Rostock! *LOL*) <a href="http://www.alice-dsl.net/js7/preview/telefonaktion_hess.png">Screenshot</a> hire social applications strategists http://eulogik.com Sat, 31 Jul 2010 16:39:51 UTC Social web applications are not made famous by spending millions of bucks on advertisement and other media. What makes an application famous is the viral strategies behind them. Check out these developers for wonderful social strategies implemented into the social applications which made them famous overnight without spending a single penny.